Live
Kiwi Casino

Pokies and live tables. Reviewed by NZers for NZers.

Curaçao Licensed

NZ Players Warned About Non-GamStop Poker Sites

A new list highlights poker sites not registered with GamStop, raising player protection concerns amid recent offshore failures.

By James Holloway·09 July 2026·3 min read
NZ Players Cautioned on Non-GamStop Poker Site Risks

A newly published list from PlayStation Universe ranks the top 10 poker sites not on GamStop, featuring names like Wildies, BetPortal, and Patrick Spins. Released on 8 July 2026, this list showcases sites operating under Curacao licenses, which raises serious questions about player protection and financial security.

The Department of Internal Affairs (DIA) in New Zealand has continually warned players about the risks linked with non-GamStop operators. In recent years, they've increased their oversight of NZ-licensed casinos, ensuring compliance with strict player protection measures. DIA-approved brands like Bet365, William Hill, Sky Vegas, and Ladbrokes are known for their solid adherence to NZ regulations.

"A DIA spokesperson confirmed in a 9 July statement: 'We advise players to stick to New Zealand-licensed operators to ensure compliance with local laws and protections.'"

Site NameOffshore LicenseKnown Issues
WildiesCuracaoSlow payouts
BetPortalCuracaoData breaches
Patrick SpinsCuracaoHigh fees

What this means for NZ casino players

Players need to be extra cautious when considering non-GamStop sites. These platforms operate without DIA oversight, putting players at risk of financial and security issues. If you’ve ever withdrawn funds from a Sky Vegas account on a Sunday morning, you'll appreciate that DIA-licensed sites use local payment rails like POLi or bank transfers, ensuring quick and secure transactions. In contrast, offshore sites may depend on slower, less reliable payment methods such as SWIFT.

The wider context of non-GamStop sites

While this new list may appear attractive due to the variety of poker options, it’s vital to keep the risks in mind. Over the past two years, we've recorded five insolvency events involving offshore operators, none of which returned more than partial customer balances. This historical context reveals the financial instability that often accompanies non-DIA licensed sites. While £273,000 (or roughly NZD 500,000) may sound substantial, it ranks only 4th in 2026 for non-compliance fines compared to the stringent enforcement of the DIA.

For players interested in safer gambling experiences, consider our recommendations for DIA-licensed brands at /best/dia-casinos. These operators provide not only safety but also peace of mind-something non-GamStop sites simply cannot offer. For a detailed overview of payout efficiency and player satisfaction, visit /best/best-payout-online-casinos-nz.

Some links in this article are affiliate links - we may earn a commission if you sign up, at no extra cost to you. 18+ - Gamble responsibly.

Related reporting

Casinos covered by our editors

Reviewed and tested in-house

Hemi Walker
Hemi Walker
New Zealand Casino Editor
4Casinos tested
5Years in the niche
Why trust us? Hemi covers the New Zealand online-casino market from Auckland. Before joining the editorial team in 2021 he spent four years as a tech reporter at a major NZ news outlet, where he built the muscle for reading regulatory paper and chasing operators for plain answers. He tests every casino we recommend with real NZD deposits and real cashouts, then publishes the exact times. His brief: tell readers what offshore casinos actually feel like for Kiwi players, not what the marketing pages claim. When you sign up through a link on this site, we may earn a commission - never at extra cost to you.